YOUNG, SANDIE v. LENNOX HEARTH PRODUCTS, INC.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1235 CA 13-00395 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
SANDIE YOUNG, PLAINTIFF,
V ORDER
LENNOX HEARTH PRODUCTS, INC., AEROPOSTALE, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, DRY CREEK PRODUCTS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO (KATHLEEN J. MARTIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT LENNOX HEARTH PRODUCTS, INC.
GOERGEN, MANSON & MCCARTHY, BUFFALO (JOSEPH G. GOERGEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AEROPOSTALE, INC.
HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered September 19, 2012. The order, inter alia, converted the cross claims of defendant Dry Creek Products, Inc., against defendants Lennox Hearth Products, Inc. and Aeropostale, Inc., into third-party claims.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
YOUNG, SANDIE v. LENNOX HEARTH PRODUCTS, INC. (YOUNG, SANDIE v. LENNOX HEARTH PRODUCTS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.