Young, R. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 6, 2015
Docket167 EM 2014
StatusPublished

This text of Young, R. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty. (Young, R. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young, R. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

ROBERT YOUNG, : No. 167 EM 2014 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ET AL, : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (hybrid representation improper).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

A True Copy As Of 1/6/2015

Attest: ___________________ John W. Person Jr., Esquire Deputy Prothonotary Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Young, R. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-r-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2015.