Young-Mi Kwon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedAugust 15, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-08640
StatusUnknown

This text of Young-Mi Kwon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Young-Mi Kwon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young-Mi Kwon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 | JOSEPH S. FOGEL Joe@adeptlawtirm com 2 | ADEPT LAW FIRM 4500 PARK GRANADA, SUITE 202F 3 | CALABASAS, CA 91302-1663 Telephone: 818-986-7100 4 || Facsimile: 818-986-7106 5 Attomeys for Plaintiff YOUNG-MI KWON 6 ANDREW S. AZARMI (SBN 241407) 7 andrew .azarm@dentons.com DENTONS US LLP g || 1999 Harrison Street Suite 1300 9 |} Oakland, CA 94612-4709 Telephone: 415 882 5000 10 || Facsimile: 415 882 0300 11 | ANNE E. WADDELL (SBN 311388) anne-waddell@dentons.com 12 | DENTONS US LLP 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1250 = 13 | Newport Beach, California 92660 Telephone: 949 732 3727 14 || Attorneys for Defendant 5 15 Attorneys for Defendant THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 0 YOUNG-MI KWON, an individual, Case No. 2:22-cv-08640-JAK-AGR Hon. John A. Kronstadt STIPULATED PROTECTIVE V. ORDER 23 | THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a business COURT 24 || entity, form unknown; and DOES 1 through 15, Inclusive, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 1 Case No. 2:22-cv-08640 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 Subject to the approval of this Court, Plaintiff Young-Mi Kwon and 2 || Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, by and through their 3 || respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following protective order: 41. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 5 Discovery in this action 1s likely to involve production of confidential, 6 |] proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 7 || disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 8 || be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 9 || enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 10 || Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 11 || discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends = 12 } only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment z 13 |) under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 5 14 || in Paragraph 8, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 15 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 2 16 |] procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 17 |] party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 18 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 19 The parties acknowledge that information produced in discovery, regardless 20 || of its designation under this Order, may contain personal and health information 21 || subject to the protections of, inter alia, the Health Insurance Portability and 22 || Accountability Act of 1996, the applicable requirements of the Standards for 23 || Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information and its implementing 24 || regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (45 25 || C_F_R. Parts 160-64; HIPAA Privacy Regulations), and California Civil Code §§ 56 26 |] et seq., and 1798.82 et seq., which protect the confidentiality of individually- 27 || identifiable personal and health information. Discovery may also involve trade 28 |] secrets, customer and pricing lists and other valuable research, development, Case No. 2:22-cv-08640 -2- STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 || commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for which special 2 || protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 3 || prosecution of this action is warranted. 4 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 5 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 6 |] protect information the parties are entitled or required to keep confidential, to 7 || ensure that the parties are permitted reasonably necessary uses of such material in 8 || preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the 9 | litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is 10 |] justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be 1] || designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated © 12 | without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public z 13 |] manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of 5 14 | this case. 15/2. DEFINITIONS 16 2.1. Action: Young Mi-Kwon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of 17 || America, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-08640-JAK-AGR. 18 2.2. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 19 |] designation of information or items under this Order. 20 2.3. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 21 || how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 22 || protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 23 || the Good Cause Statement. It also includes the following types of documents and 24 || information: 25 a. information that is proprietary or constitutes a trade secret, 26 || including, without limitation, information, materials, and other documents 27 || reflecting non-public business or financial strategies and confidential competitive 28 Case No. 2:22-cv-08640 -3- STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 information that, if disclosed, could result in prejudice or harm to the disclosing 2 || party: 3 b. non-public financial or business information; 4 c. information that is otherwise generally unavailable to the public; 5 d. __ policyholder-specific information, including private medical 6 || information. 7 Any copies or reproductions, excerpts, summaries, or other documents or 8 || media that contain or incorporate CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will also be 9 |] treated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION under this Order. 10 Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order will be construed as requiring 11 || Defendant to produce any personal or identifying information regarding any © 12 } individual or any other policyholder, nor policyholder information that is protected z 13 || from disclosure under applicable state or federal law. 5 14 2.4. Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 15 || their support staff). 2 16 2.5. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 17 |] items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 18 | “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” 19 2.6. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 20 || of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 21 || among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things) that are produced or 22 || generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 23 2.7. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 24 || pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 25 || an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 26 2.8. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 27 || House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 28 || counsel. Case No. 2:22-cv-08640 -4- STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 2.9. Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or 2 |] other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 3 2.10. Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 4 | party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 5 | have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 6 |] that has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 7 2.11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 56
California CIV § 56

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Young-Mi Kwon v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-mi-kwon-v-the-prudential-insurance-company-of-america-cacd-2023.