Young-Maile v. Maile

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Young-Maile v. Maile

813 So. 2d 1077, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5222, 2002 WL 662824

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-3777

StatusPublished

This text of 813 So. 2d 1077 (Young-Maile v. Maile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young-Maile v. Maile, 813 So. 2d 1077, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5222, 2002 WL 662824 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order that denied appellant’s rule 1.540 motion. We find competent, substantial evidence in the record to establish appellee’s intent and presence within the State of Florida for the six months that preceded his filing of the petition for dissolution of marriage. See § 61.021, Fla. Stat. (1999)(to obtain a dissolution of marriage, one of the parties to the marriage must reside six months in the state before the filing of the petition); Jenkins v. Jenkins, 556 So.2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1279 (1990); see also Hunter v. Hunter, 736 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

KLEIN, STEVENSON, JJ., and DELL, JOHN W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order that denied appellant’s rule 1.540 motion. We find competent, substantial evidence in the record to establish appellee’s intent and presence within the State of Florida for the six months that preceded his filing of the petition for dissolution of marriage. See § 61.021, Fla. Stat. (1999)(to obtain a dissolution of marriage, one of the parties to the marriage must reside six months in the state before the filing of the petition); Jenkins v. Jenkins, 556 So.2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1279 (1990); see also Hunter v. Hunter, 736 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

KLEIN, STEVENSON, JJ., and DELL, JOHN W., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

813 So. 2d 1077, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5222, 2002 WL 662824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-maile-v-maile-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack