Young Ja Suh v. Department of Mental Hygiene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Young Ja Suh v. Department of Mental Hygiene

58 A.D.2d 738, 396 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 A.D.2d 738 (Young Ja Suh v. Department of Mental Hygiene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young Ja Suh v. Department of Mental Hygiene, 58 A.D.2d 738, 396 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding seeking reinstatement to her former position as a pharmacist at a State mental hospital. Respondent now appeals from an order directing that petitioner be accorded a departmental hearing to review the propriety of her discharge. Such an order is both intermediate and nonfinal and may not be appealed as of right (CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 1; Cirasole v Simins, 48 AD2d 795; Coor Dev. Corp. v Wever, 41 AD2d 689). Since the record does not disclose that permission to appeal was either sought or granted and since the time to seek such leave has expired (see CPLR 5513), the appeal must be dismissed (Cirasole v Simins, supra; Coor Dev. Corp. v Weber, supra). In any event, had respondent moved this court for leave to appeal, under the circumstances of this case, we would have denied the application. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court—article 78.) Present—Moule, J. P., Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding seeking reinstatement to her former position as a pharmacist at a State mental hospital. Respondent now appeals from an order directing that petitioner be accorded a departmental hearing to review the propriety of her discharge. Such an order is both intermediate and nonfinal and may not be appealed as of right (CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 1; Cirasole v Simins, 48 AD2d 795; Coor Dev. Corp. v Wever, 41 AD2d 689). Since the record does not disclose that permission to appeal was either sought or granted and since the time to seek such leave has expired (see CPLR 5513), the appeal must be dismissed (Cirasole v Simins, supra; Coor Dev. Corp. v Weber, supra). In any event, had respondent moved this court for leave to appeal, under the circumstances of this case, we would have denied the application. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court—article 78.) Present—Moule, J. P., Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 738, 396 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-ja-suh-v-department-of-mental-hygiene-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack