Young (Gregory) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Young (Gregory) v. State

DecidedApril 9, 2013

Docket61060

StatusUnpublished

This text of Young (Gregory) v. State (Young (Gregory) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young (Gregory) v. State, (Neb. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

This evidence provides slight to marginal evidence, Sheriff v. Shade, 109 Nev. 826, 828, 858 P.2d 840, 841 (1993), that Young had constructive possession of the vehicle, see Palmer v. State, 112 Nev. 763, 768-69, 920 P.2d 112, 115 (1996) (discussing constructive possession); cf. Baker v. State, 93 Nev. 11, 558 P.2d 629 (1977) (defendant's presence in a vehicle containing stolen property combined with surrounding circumstances gave rise to reasonable inference that he probably possessed the stolen property), and thus committed the charged offense, see NRS 205.273(1)(b). Accordingly, we conclude that Young fails to demonstrate that the district court erred by denying his petition, see Shade, 109 Nev. at 828, 858 P.2d at 841, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 2

J. Cherry

2Although we filed the fast track statement and appendix submitted by Young, they fail to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. Young's fast track statement refers to matters in the record without specific citation to the appendix, see NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C), and the appendix does not contain all required documents, see NRAP 3C(e)(2)(C) and 30(b). Additionally, despite this court's issuance of a notice of deficient certificate of compliance, counsel failed to file a certificate of compliance in compliance with NRAP 3C(h)(3). Counsel for Young, Gemma Greene Waldron, is cautioned that the failure to comply with all applicable rules and directives of this court in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n); Smith v. Emery, 109 Nev. 737, 743, 856 P.2d 1386, 1390 (1993).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

.1 " 1 r cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Law Office of Gemma Greene Waldron, PLLC Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I 947A • 3 INZEB2INEEENEENWZMI - .47,2774W .67 '41),..3MMatitiANCSZ-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This evidence provides slight to marginal evidence, Sheriff v. Shade, 109 Nev. 826, 828, 858 P.2d 840, 841 (1993), that Young had constructive possession of the vehicle, see Palmer v. State, 112 Nev. 763, 768-69, 920 P.2d 112, 115 (1996) (discussing constructive possession); cf. Baker v. State, 93 Nev. 11, 558 P.2d 629 (1977) (defendant's presence in a vehicle containing stolen property combined with surrounding circumstances gave rise to reasonable inference that he probably possessed the stolen property), and thus committed the charged offense, see NRS 205.273(1)(b). Accordingly, we conclude that Young fails to demonstrate that the district court erred by denying his petition, see Shade, 109 Nev. at 828, 858 P.2d at 841, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 2

J. Cherry

2Although we filed the fast track statement and appendix submitted by Young, they fail to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. Young's fast track statement refers to matters in the record without specific citation to the appendix, see NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C), and the appendix does not contain all required documents, see NRAP 3C(e)(2)(C) and 30(b). Additionally, despite this court's issuance of a notice of deficient certificate of compliance, counsel failed to file a certificate of compliance in compliance with NRAP 3C(h)(3). Counsel for Young, Gemma Greene Waldron, is cautioned that the failure to comply with all applicable rules and directives of this court in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n); Smith v. Emery, 109 Nev. 737, 743, 856 P.2d 1386, 1390 (1993).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

.1 " 1 r cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Law Office of Gemma Greene Waldron, PLLC Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I 947A • 3 INZEB2INEEENEENWZMI - .47,2774W .67 '41),..3MMatitiANCSZ-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Young (Gregory) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-gregory-v-state-nev-2013.

Opinion

J. Cherry

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack