Young

Court of Claims

Young

194 Ct. Cl. 1028, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 137, 1971 WL 4132

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 30, 1971

DocketNo. 143-70

StatusPublished

This text of 194 Ct. Cl. 1028 (Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young, 194 Ct. Cl. 1028, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 137, 1971 WL 4132 (cc 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff seeks to recover sums of money confiscated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation at [1029]*1029tbe time of his arrest in June 1967, and also seeks general, actual and punitive damages for alleged violation of Ms constitutional rights. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition or in the alternative for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concludes that plaintiff’s alleged claim is barred under the doctrine of collateral estoppel based upon the decision and adjudication of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division, as to the ownership of the confiscated funds. On April 30, 1971 the court by order granted defendant’s motion, and dismissed the petition, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff seeks to recover sums of money confiscated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation at [1029]*1029tbe time of his arrest in June 1967, and also seeks general, actual and punitive damages for alleged violation of Ms constitutional rights. This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition or in the alternative for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concludes that plaintiff’s alleged claim is barred under the doctrine of collateral estoppel based upon the decision and adjudication of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division, as to the ownership of the confiscated funds. On April 30, 1971 the court by order granted defendant’s motion, and dismissed the petition, as amended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Ct. Cl. 1028, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 137, 1971 WL 4132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-cc-1971.