Young Bok Song v. Welch

Fourth Circuit

Young Bok Song v. Welch

410 F. App'x 648

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2011·No. No. 10-7036·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Young Bok Song appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Song v. Welch, No. 5:09-cv-00072-D, 2010 WL 2813305 (E.D.N.C. July 16, 2010). We deny Song’s motions to appoint counsel and an interpreter. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Young Bok Song appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Song v. Welch, No. 5:09-cv-00072-D, 2010 WL 2813305 (E.D.N.C. July 16, 2010). We deny Song’s motions to appoint counsel and an interpreter. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Young Bok Song v. Welch, 410 F. App'x 648 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

410 F. App'x 648 (Young Bok Song v. Welch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related