Young Bok Song v. Welch

410 F. App'x 648
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 14, 2011
DocketNo. 10-7036
StatusPublished

This text of 410 F. App'x 648 (Young Bok Song v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young Bok Song v. Welch, 410 F. App'x 648 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Young Bok Song appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Song v. Welch, No. 5:09-cv-00072-D, 2010 WL 2813305 (E.D.N.C. July 16, 2010). We deny Song’s motions to appoint counsel and an interpreter. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 F. App'x 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-bok-song-v-welch-ca4-2011.