Youlin Wang v. Forensic Professional Group USA, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 6 7 YOULIN WANG, Case No. 20-cv-08033-BLF 8 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 v. ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN AS TO FORENSIC 10 RICHARD KAHN, et al., PROFESSIONALS GROUP, USA, INC 11 Respondents. a 12

13 On August 11, 2022, the Court heard and granted Douglas E. Klein’s motion to withdraw

v 14 || as counsel for Respondents Richard Kahn and Forensic Professionals Group, USA, Inc. (“FGP”). © 2 15 || At the hearing, Mr. Kahn informed the Court that he intended to represent himself pro se. Mr. A 16 |} Kahn also represented, as FGP’s agent, that he did not intend to obtain counsel for Respondent

= 17 FGP, which, as a corporation, cannot represent itself. Civil L.R. 3-9(b); see also, e.g., Rowland v.

4 18 || California Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993). 19 Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and before August 20 25, 2022, why the answer (ECF No. 91) should not be stricken with respect to Respondent FGP. 22 23 || Dated: August 11, 2022 24 mip) BETH LABSON FREEMAN 25 United States District Judge 26 27 28