Youle v. Brotherton
10 Johns. 363
Opinion
The former nonsuit was no bar to a new action for the same cause; nor had the justice any right to dismiss the action because the costs of the former suit were unpaid. The higher courts will sometimes stay proceedings in a suit, until the costs of a former suit for the same matter are paid; but this is done on a rule to show cause, and in the exercise df a large and liberal discretion. But no such power dr discretidh can be assumed by a justice’s court.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Youle v. Brotherton, 10 Johns. 363 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).
10 Johns. 363 (Youle v. Brotherton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. Davis
8 Daly 185 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1878)
Flewelling v. Brandon
4 Daly 333 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1872)