Yost v. Yost

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Yost v. Yost

775 So. 2d 797, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 493, 2000 WL 1072346

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedAugust 4, 2000

Docket2980338

StatusPublished

This text of 775 So. 2d 797 (Yost v. Yost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yost v. Yost, 775 So. 2d 797, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 493, 2000 WL 1072346 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

This court, on June 25, 1999, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 777 So.2d 332 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (table). This court’s judgment has been affirmed in part; reversed in part; and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Yost, 775 So.2d 794 (Ala.2000). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed to the extent it failed to reserve the right to award periodic alimony in the future (that is the only portion of the trial court’s judgment now before us), and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

JUDGMENT REVERSED IN PART; AND CASE REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and CRAWLEY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

After Remand from the Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

This court, on June 25, 1999, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. 777 So.2d 332 (Ala.Civ.App.1999) (table). This court’s judgment has been affirmed in part; reversed in part; and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Yost, 775 So.2d 794 (Ala.2000). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed to the extent it failed to reserve the right to award periodic alimony in the future (that is the only portion of the trial court’s judgment now before us), and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

JUDGMENT REVERSED IN PART; AND CASE REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and CRAWLEY, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

775 So. 2d 797, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 493, 2000 WL 1072346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yost-v-yost-alacivapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack