Yost v. Gunby
145 S.E.2d 575, 221 Ga. 552, 1965 Ga. LEXIS 526
Opinion
In this case the appellants filed their enumeration of errors 19 days after the appeal was docketed in this court. Hence, the case is controlled by Stanford v. Evans, Reed & Williams, 221 Ga. 331, which held that an enumeration of errors filed more than 15 days after the appeal was docketed in this court was not timely.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yost v. Gunby, 145 S.E.2d 575, 221 Ga. 552, 1965 Ga. LEXIS 526 (Ga. 1965).
145 S.E.2d 575 (Yost v. Gunby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ewing v. Whitehead
166 S.E.2d 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Kurtz v. State
155 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Horton v. Western Contracting Corp.
149 S.E.2d 542 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Noles v. Lee
147 S.E.2d 445 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Smith v. Smith
147 S.E.2d 466 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Cade v. Burson
146 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Undercofler v. McLennan
146 S.E.2d 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)