Yost v. Blumenfeld
This text of 61 A.D.2d 981 (Yost v. Blumenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for fraudulent inducement to enter into a contract, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 8, 1977, as denied the branch of appellants’ motion which sought dismissal of the first cause of action of the complaint. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. An issue of fact exists as to the first cause of action which can only be resolved at a trial. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 A.D.2d 981, 402 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yost-v-blumenfeld-nyappdiv-1978.