Yoshiro Roy Yamaura v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Yoshiro Roy Yamaura v. United States

282 F.2d 564

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 12, 1960·No. 16844_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the district court denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is affirmed.

Previously, the same appellant presented the same question to the same district court and relief was denied. Under the circumstances of this case, there is no need to consider the question again. See Burns v. United States, 8 Cir., 229 F.2d 87.

However, appellant’s contention that he has been given consecutive sentences on two counts and that the two counts constituted one offense has been answered adversely to him in Gore v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 315, 244 F.2d 763, affirmed 357 U.S. 386, 78 S.Ct. 1280, 2 L. Ed.2d 1405.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order of the district court denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is affirmed.

Previously, the same appellant presented the same question to the same district court and relief was denied. Under the circumstances of this case, there is no need to consider the question again. See Burns v. United States, 8 Cir., 229 F.2d 87.

However, appellant’s contention that he has been given consecutive sentences on two counts and that the two counts constituted one offense has been answered adversely to him in Gore v. United States, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 315, 244 F.2d 763, affirmed 357 U.S. 386, 78 S.Ct. 1280, 2 L. Ed.2d 1405.

Yoshiro Roy Yamaura v. United States, 282 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

282 F.2d 564 (Yoshiro Roy Yamaura v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related