Yoshida-Conselva v. Vivas
This text of Yoshida-Conselva v. Vivas (Yoshida-Conselva v. Vivas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 18-OCT-2021 10:35 AM Dkt. 9 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
TERI YOSHIDA-CONSELVA, Claimant-Appellant, v. PATRICK M. VIVAS, Employer-Appellee, and HAWAII EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Insurance Carrier-Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD (CASE NO. AB 2021-062; DCD NO. 2-19-50513)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On July 28, 2021, self-represented Claimant- Appellant Teri Yoshida-Conselva (Yoshida-Conselva) filed the notice of appeal without the fees required by Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 3(a); (2) On August 9, 2021, the Chief Clerk of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board filed a notice of non-payment, instructing Yoshida-Conselva to pay the filing fee or seek a fee waiver on or before August 24, 2021; (3) The record on appeal was due on or before September 27, 2021. See HRAP Rules 11(b)(1) & 26(a); (4) On September 28, 2021, the appellate clerk entered a default of the record on appeal, informing Yoshida-Conselva that the time to docket the appeal had expired, she had not paid the filing fee or obtained an order allowing her to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the matter would be brought to the court's attention on October 8, 2021, for action that may include NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
dismissal of the appeal, and she could seek relief from default by motion; (5) Yoshida-Conselva took no further action in the appeal; and (6) An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 18, 2021.
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yoshida-Conselva v. Vivas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yoshida-conselva-v-vivas-hawapp-2021.