Yorysch v. Wallach

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Yorysch v. Wallach

168 Misc. 257, 5 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1734

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 21, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 15 of the Municipal Court Code, we do not think the entry of the judgments in the borough of Manhattan, the borough of the creditor’s residence, instead of in one of the eight districts of the borough of Brooklyn, the debtor being a resident of Kangs county, warranted the vacatur of the judgments. By its terms section 543 of the Civil Practice Act is applicable to Supreme Court judgments. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and N oonan, J J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 15 of the Municipal Court Code, we do not think the entry of the judgments in the borough of Manhattan, the borough of the creditor’s residence, instead of in one of the eight districts of the borough of Brooklyn, the debtor being a resident of Kangs county, warranted the vacatur of the judgments. By its terms section 543 of the Civil Practice Act is applicable to Supreme Court judgments. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and N oonan, J J.

Yorysch v. Wallach, 168 Misc. 257, 5 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

168 Misc. 257 (Yorysch v. Wallach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related