Yorks v. Peck

New York Supreme Court

Yorks v. Peck

17 How. Pr. 192

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 How. Pr. 192 (Yorks v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yorks v. Peck, 17 How. Pr. 192 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

By the court—Johnson, Justice.

The tenth rule requires the attorney, on every process or paper to- be served, not only to subscribe his name, but to add thereto his place of business. The paper served was a memorandum and not a notice, as it was not subscribed by the attorney or party. Where a party undertakes to limit the time for appealing, he must serve such a notice as the rules and practice require. He should be held to strict practice in such cases.

Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court—Johnson, Justice.

The tenth rule requires the attorney, on every process or paper to- be served, not only to subscribe his name, but to add thereto his place of business. The paper served was a memorandum and not a notice, as it was not subscribed by the attorney or party. Where a party undertakes to limit the time for appealing, he must serve such a notice as the rules and practice require. He should be held to strict practice in such cases.

Motion denied with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 How. Pr. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yorks-v-peck-nysupct-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack