Yorkey v. Diab

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 2012
Docket2011-1360
StatusUnpublished

This text of Yorkey v. Diab (Yorkey v. Diab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yorkey v. Diab, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

THOMAS J. YORKEY, Appellant,

v.

MOHAMED K. DIAB, ESMAIEL KIANI- AZRBAYJANY, IBRAHIM M. ELFADEL, REX J. MCCARTHY, WALTER M. WEBER, and ROBERT A. SMITH, Appellees. ____________________

2011-1360 (Interference No. 105,471) ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

LAURENCE S. ROGERS, Ropes & Gray, of New York, New York, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was STUART W. YOTHERS.

JOSEPH R. RE, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for appellees. With him on the brief were BRENTON R. BABCOCK and JAROM D. KESLER. Of counsel was IRFAN A. LATEEF. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yorkey v. Diab, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yorkey-v-diab-cafc-2012.