Yorkey v. Diab
This text of Yorkey v. Diab (Yorkey v. Diab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
THOMAS J. YORKEY, Appellant,
v.
MOHAMED K. DIAB, ESMAIEL KIANI- AZRBAYJANY, IBRAHIM M. ELFADEL, REX J. MCCARTHY, WALTER M. WEBER, and ROBERT A. SMITH, Appellees. ____________________
2011-1360 (Interference No. 105,471) ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
LAURENCE S. ROGERS, Ropes & Gray, of New York, New York, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was STUART W. YOTHERS.
JOSEPH R. RE, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for appellees. With him on the brief were BRENTON R. BABCOCK and JAROM D. KESLER. Of counsel was IRFAN A. LATEEF. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yorkey v. Diab, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yorkey-v-diab-cafc-2012.