York & Whitney Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
239 U.S. 631, 60 L. Ed. 477, 36 S. Ct. 166, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1421
Opinion
Dismissed for the. want of jurisdiction upon, the authority of (1) Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; The Mellon Company v. McCafferty, this day decided, ante, p. 134; (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; see Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, 97-98, and cases cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
York & Whitney Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 239 U.S. 631, 60 L. Ed. 477, 36 S. Ct. 166, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1421 (1915).
239 U.S. 631 (York & Whitney Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown
187 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
231 U.S. 245 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
235 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Maxwell
237 U.S. 94 (Supreme Court, 1915)