York & Whitney Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
This text of 239 U.S. 631 (York & Whitney Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for the. want of jurisdiction upon, the authority of (1) Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; The Mellon Company v. McCafferty, this day decided, ante, p. 134; (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; see Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, 97-98, and cases cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 U.S. 631, 60 L. Ed. 477, 36 S. Ct. 166, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/york-whitney-co-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-scotus-1915.