York v. York
This text of 293 A.D.2d 530 (York v. York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a separation or divorce, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated September 14, 2000, which denied her motion to hold the defendant and certain nonparties in contempt and for an award of an attorney’s fee.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion to hold the defendant and certain nonparties in contempt. Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly declined to award the plaintiff an attorney’s fee (see Cowles v Stahmer, 255 AD2d 103, 105). Prudenti, P.J., Altman, S. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 A.D.2d 530, 739 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/york-v-york-nyappdiv-2002.