York v. York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

York v. York

285 A.D.2d 500, 727 N.Y.S.2d 653, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7094

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated May 17, 2000, which denied her motion to disqualify the defendant’s counsel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the defendant’s counsel (see, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437, 443; Olmoz v Town of Fishkill, 258 AD2d 447). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated May 17, 2000, which denied her motion to disqualify the defendant’s counsel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the defendant’s counsel (see, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437, 443; Olmoz v Town of Fishkill, 258 AD2d 447). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

York v. York, 285 A.D.2d 500, 727 N.Y.S.2d 653, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

285 A.D.2d 500 (York v. York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related