York v. State

91 S.W.2d 1064
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in York v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 Tex. Crim. 659
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 1936·No. No. 18013·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of unlawfully transporting spirituous intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky; and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

Pending the appeal of this case, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which this conviction was had has been repealed. See Acts of the 44th Legislature, 2d Called Sess. c. 467, § 49, article 1, Liquor Control Act (Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666 — 49); and the rule announced by this court in the case of Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be, and the same is, reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

York v. State, 91 S.W.2d 1064 (Tex. 1936).

91 S.W.2d 1064 (York v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)