York v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

York v. State

1955 OK CR 43, 281 P.2d 769, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 190

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 23, 1955

DocketA-12086

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 1955 OK CR 43 (York v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

York v. State, 1955 OK CR 43, 281 P.2d 769, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 190 (Okla. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, Presiding Judge.

Charles Edwin York was charged by'an information filed in the District Court of Oklahoma County with the crime of robbery with firearms, was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve' 45 years in the penitentiary.

A petition in error with a transcript of the record attached has been filed in this court. However, no brief has been filed in behalf of the accused and no appearance was made in his behalf at the time the case was assigned for oral argument.

An examination of the petition in error discloses that the questions assigned as error can only be determined b'y the examination of a casemade containing a certified record of the evidence introduced at the trial. Since the record of the evidence introduced at the trial is not before us, we cannot determine any of the assignments of error. There is nothing in the transcript of the record to -show that the judgment and sentence should not have been rendered.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court of Oklahoma County is affirmed.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI