York v. Mayfield Neurological Inst., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

York v. Mayfield Neurological Inst., Inc.

2000 Ohio 323, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1230

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 28, 2000

Docket1999-0924

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 323 (York v. Mayfield Neurological Inst., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

York v. Mayfield Neurological Inst., Inc., 2000 Ohio 323, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1230 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 1230.]

YORK ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. MAYFIELD NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS. [Cite as York v. Mayfield Neurological Inst., Inc., 2000-Ohio-323.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 99-924—Submitted February 9, 2000—Decided March 29, 2000.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, Nos. CA96-08-164 and CA97-03-057. __________________ Holbrock & Jonson Co., L.P.A., Michael D. Shanks and Timothy R. Evans, for appellants and cross-appellees. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., James M. Hall, Jr., and Marcia V. Andrew; Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, L.L.P., and David W. Peck, for appellees and cross-appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 1230.]

YORK ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES, v. MAYFIELD NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS. [Cite as York v. Mayfield Neurological Inst., Inc., 2000-Ohio-323.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 99-924—Submitted February 9, 2000—Decided March 29, 2000.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, Nos. CA96-08-164 and CA97-03-057. __________________ Holbrock & Jonson Co., L.P.A., Michael D. Shanks and Timothy R. Evans, for appellants and cross-appellees. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., James M. Hall, Jr., and Marcia V. Andrew; Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, L.L.P., and David W. Peck, for appellees and cross-appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 323, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/york-v-mayfield-neurological-inst-inc-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack