York Manufacturing Co. v. Mager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

York Manufacturing Co. v. Mager

165 A.D. 872, 150 N.Y.S. 973, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8612

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1914·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an action for the conversion of part of a refrigerating plant. It was tried with Shipley Construction and Supply Company against these defendants, the appeal in which is to be decided herewith. (165. App. Div. 866.) The material facts and the points presented by the appeal are the same in each. Our opinion in the other case is controlling here.

It follows that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Shipley Construction & Supply Co. v. Mager (165 App. Div. 866), argued and decided herewith.

Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin,. Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This is an action for the conversion of part of a refrigerating plant. It was tried with Shipley Construction and Supply Company against these defendants, the appeal in which is to be decided herewith. (165. App. Div. 866.) The material facts and the points presented by the appeal are the same in each. Our opinion in the other case is controlling here.

It follows that the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Shipley Construction & Supply Co. v. Mager (165 App. Div. 866), argued and decided herewith.

Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin,. Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

York Manufacturing Co. v. Mager, 165 A.D. 872, 150 N.Y.S. 973, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

165 A.D. 872 (York Manufacturing Co. v. Mager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related