York County National Bank of York v. Deline & Elms, Inc.

166 A. 670, 35 Del. 426, 5 W.W. Harr. 426, 1932 Del. LEXIS 32
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedMay 19, 1932
DocketNos. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 166 A. 670 (York County National Bank of York v. Deline & Elms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
York County National Bank of York v. Deline & Elms, Inc., 166 A. 670, 35 Del. 426, 5 W.W. Harr. 426, 1932 Del. LEXIS 32 (Del. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Rice, J.,

in granting the motions to dismiss the petitions to intervene, in substance, said: That the petitioner had already replevied the shovels seized in the attachment proceedings and as its right to retain such shovels under its conditional sale contract could be determined in those actions, there was no good reason why it should be permitted to intervene in these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 670, 35 Del. 426, 5 W.W. Harr. 426, 1932 Del. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/york-county-national-bank-of-york-v-deline-elms-inc-delsuperct-1932.