York Car Wash & Parking, Inc. v. Department of General Services

80 A.D.2d 792, 437 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10594
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 792 (York Car Wash & Parking, Inc. v. Department of General Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
York Car Wash & Parking, Inc. v. Department of General Services, 80 A.D.2d 792, 437 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 16, 1980, reversed, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and plaintiff-respondent’s motion for a preliminary injunction denied, without costs. Though common courtesy might have dictated some special form of notice to a lessee of New York City property that its leasehold was one of 51 such property interests about to be auctioned off, there is no statutory dictate requiring the same. The mail being what it is, it is understandable that the postcard notice of the auction never reached petitioner, and its principal officer learned of impending doom too late for all practical purposes to submit a timely bid. None of plaintiff’s actually existing rights were interfered with by the city’s action: tenant claims, at most, that the existing lease will expire by its terms in a few short months and, should the city earlier exercise its clear option, it may cancel the lease on notice of 30 days. In addition, any successful bidder for the franchise now held by plaintiff would take subject to such rights as are now — dubiously — enjoyed by plaintiff. Thus, there is no evident clear showing by plaintiff of a right to the relief [793]*793sought, and the grant of preliminary injunction of completion of the auction was improvident. Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Edward F.
154 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 A.D.2d 792, 437 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/york-car-wash-parking-inc-v-department-of-general-services-nyappdiv-1981.