Yoris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yoris v. State

573 So. 2d 197, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 455, 1991 WL 6293

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 1991

DocketNo. 88-03131

StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 197 (Yoris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yoris v. State, 573 So. 2d 197, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 455, 1991 WL 6293 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction for first degree murder. We have carefully considered defendant’s various contentions on appeal and do not conclude that there was reversible error. See Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984); Benson v. State, 526 So.2d 948, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069, 109 S.Ct. 1349, 103 L.Ed.2d 817 (1989) (quoting Dirring v. United States, 328 F.2d 512, 515 (1st Cir.1964) (“If enough pieces of a jigsaw puzzle fit together the subject may be identified even though some pieces are lacking.”)); Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d [198]*198150, 152 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 496 So.2d 144 (Fla.1986); State v. Griffith, 561 So.2d 528, 530 (Fla.1990); Matter of Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, 431 So.2d 594, 595 (Fla.), modified, 431 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1981); Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201, 1204-05 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178, 106 S.Ct. 2908, 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction for first degree murder. We have carefully considered defendant’s various contentions on appeal and do not conclude that there was reversible error. See Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984); Benson v. State, 526 So.2d 948, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069, 109 S.Ct. 1349, 103 L.Ed.2d 817 (1989) (quoting Dirring v. United States, 328 F.2d 512, 515 (1st Cir.1964) (“If enough pieces of a jigsaw puzzle fit together the subject may be identified even though some pieces are lacking.”)); Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d [198]*198150, 152 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 496 So.2d 144 (Fla.1986); State v. Griffith, 561 So.2d 528, 530 (Fla.1990); Matter of Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, 431 So.2d 594, 595 (Fla.), modified, 431 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1981); Suarez v. State, 481 So.2d 1201, 1204-05 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1178, 106 S.Ct. 2908, 90 L.Ed.2d 994 (1986).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 So. 2d 197, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 455, 1991 WL 6293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yoris-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack