Yorgy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 10, 2021
Docket19-1494
StatusUnpublished

This text of Yorgy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Yorgy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yorgy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1494V Filed: January 11, 2021 UNPUBLISHED

Special Master Horner HANNAH YORGY,

Petitioner, Order Concluding Proceedings; v. Vaccine Rule 21(a) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Matthew L. Owens, Law Offices of Matthew L. Owens, Harrisburg, PA, for petitioner. Voris Edward Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On January 11, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, stating that “[t]he parties hereby stipulate pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) that this action shall be dismissed.” (ECF No. 46.)

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Daniel T. Horner Daniel T. Horner Special Master

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, it will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. See 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, it will be redacted from public access.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yorgy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yorgy-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2021.