Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State
This text of Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State (Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-19-00017-CR
Yordanys Avila-Trujillo, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-17-0881, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on March 4,
2019. On March 6, 2019, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to
appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the
clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and
submit a status report regarding this appeal by March 26, 2019. Further, the notice advised
appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal
for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). To date, neither appellant nor his counsel
has filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has
not been filed.
However, we note that the district clerk’s information sheet filed with the notice
of appeal indicates that appellant had appointed counsel at trial. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed the notice of appeal and is the designated counsel on appeal. Although the trial-
court clerk has notified us that no affidavit of indigence has been filed in appellant’s case, it
appears that appellant was determined indigent at some point, and the trial court appointed
counsel.
Accordingly, the appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court
shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether
the appellant is indigent, and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned this appeal. The court shall
make appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 37.3(a)(2) (appellate court
must make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and preserve parties’ rights when
record has not been timely filed); id. R. 35.3(c) (appellate court must allow record to be filed late
when delay is not appellant’s fault). If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who
will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. See id. R. 38.8(4) (appellate court may act
appropriately to ensure appellant’s rights are protected when appellant is represented by
counsel). Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the
appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to
be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than June 17, 2019.
It is so ordered May 16, 2019.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith
Abated and Remanded
Filed: May 16, 2019
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yordanys-avila-trujillo-v-state-texapp-2019.