Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 16, 2019
Docket03-19-00017-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State (Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00017-CR

Yordanys Avila-Trujillo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-17-0881, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on March 4,

2019. On March 6, 2019, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to

appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the

clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and

submit a status report regarding this appeal by March 26, 2019. Further, the notice advised

appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). To date, neither appellant nor his counsel

has filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has

not been filed.

However, we note that the district clerk’s information sheet filed with the notice

of appeal indicates that appellant had appointed counsel at trial. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed the notice of appeal and is the designated counsel on appeal. Although the trial-

court clerk has notified us that no affidavit of indigence has been filed in appellant’s case, it

appears that appellant was determined indigent at some point, and the trial court appointed

counsel.

Accordingly, the appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court

shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether

the appellant is indigent, and, if so, whether counsel has abandoned this appeal. The court shall

make appropriate written findings and recommendations. See id. R. 37.3(a)(2) (appellate court

must make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and preserve parties’ rights when

record has not been timely filed); id. R. 35.3(c) (appellate court must allow record to be filed late

when delay is not appellant’s fault). If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who

will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. See id. R. 38.8(4) (appellate court may act

appropriately to ensure appellant’s rights are protected when appellant is represented by

counsel). Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the

appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including all findings and orders—to

be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than June 17, 2019.

It is so ordered May 16, 2019.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Abated and Remanded

Filed: May 16, 2019

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yordanys Avila-Trujillo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yordanys-avila-trujillo-v-state-texapp-2019.