Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul

Eighth Circuit

Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 2020

Docket19-2518

StatusUnpublished

This text of Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul (Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul, (8th Cir. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-2518 ___________________________

Yoonjong Faubus

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________

Submitted: January 31, 2020 Filed: February 5, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Yoonjong Faubus appeals a district court1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. We agree with the district court that Faubus received a full and fair administrative hearing. See Passmore v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 658, 663-64 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing de novo challenge to procedures of social security disability hearing). The judgment is affirmed. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI