Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 5, 2020·No. 19-2518·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 19-2518

Yoonjong Faubus

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

Submitted: January 31, 2020 Filed: February 5, 2020

[Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Yoonjong Faubus appeals a district court1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. We agree with the district court that Faubus received a full and fair administrative hearing. See Passmore v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 658, 663-64 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing de novo challenge to procedures of social security disability hearing). The judgment is affirmed.

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul, (8th Cir. 2020).

Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul (Yoonjong Faubus v. Andrew Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Passmore v. Astrue
533 F.3d 658 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)