YONO v. Carlson
772 N.W.2d 381, 485 Mich. 897
This text of 772 N.W.2d 381 (YONO v. Carlson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
YONO v. Carlson, 772 N.W.2d 381, 485 Mich. 897 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Marcus YONO, Livingston Building Company, L.L.C., and Suttons Pointe Development, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Eric CARLSON and Leelanau Enterprise, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Davis
772 N.W.2d 381 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
772 N.W.2d 381, 485 Mich. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yono-v-carlson-mich-2009.