Yonkers Racing Corp. v. Corbisiero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yonkers Racing Corp. v. Corbisiero

160 A.D.2d 465

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D.2d 465 (Yonkers Racing Corp. v. Corbisiero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yonkers Racing Corp. v. Corbisiero, 160 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

—Petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered January 11, 1989, to review respondent’s determination dated on or about September 24, 1988, which revoked petitioner’s television simulcast facility license, is dismissed as moot, without costs.

The two agreements before us on this appeal have, since the commencement of the proceeding on September 22, 1988, both expired by their respective terms on January 30, 1990. Of course "it must be explicitly stated that in dismissing the present appeal as moot we express no view on the merits.” (Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 717.) Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding, transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered January 11, 1989, to review respondent’s determination dated on or about September 24, 1988, which revoked petitioner’s television simulcast facility license, is dismissed as moot, without costs.

The two agreements before us on this appeal have, since the commencement of the proceeding on September 22, 1988, both expired by their respective terms on January 30, 1990. Of course "it must be explicitly stated that in dismissing the present appeal as moot we express no view on the merits.” (Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 717.) Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Wallach and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D.2d 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yonkers-racing-corp-v-corbisiero-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack