Yonkers Garden Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

53 A.D.2d 697, 385 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13452
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 28, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 697 (Yonkers Garden Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yonkers Garden Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 53 A.D.2d 697, 385 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination [698]*698of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated October 3, 1975, which, after a hearing, held that the petitioner landlords had failed to maintain all services required to be furnished by law and, accordingly, reduced the rents for the apartments in the buildings in question to the rents in effect on July 1, 1975, until such time as the petitioners comply with the applicable law, ordinance or regulation and the City of Yonkers files a written certification thereof. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remanded to the respondents for a full hearing and a new determination in accordance herewith. In the absence of a record, this court is unable to decide the propriety of the order sought to be reviewed. A new hearing should therefore be held and a record made (narrative or otherwise) which can be reviewed by this court. At such hearing there should be a full opportunity for examination and cross-examination. The ensuing determination should also include a statement as to what violations, if any, respondents have found, so that this court can correctly determine whether the amount of the rent rollback was proper. At this point, based on the inadequate record before us, it appears that the loss of approximately $66,000 suffered by the petitioners may have been too harsh a penalty. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yonkers Garden Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
63 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.2d 697, 385 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yonkers-garden-co-v-new-york-state-division-of-housing-community-nyappdiv-1976.