Yonkers Community Development Agency v. Barca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yonkers Community Development Agency v. Barca

52 A.D.2d 604, 382 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12217

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 604 (Yonkers Community Development Agency v. Barca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yonkers Community Development Agency v. Barca, 52 A.D.2d 604, 382 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, plaintiff appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 3, 1975, which, inter alia, (1) confirmed a report of commissioners of appraisal and (2) granted respondents Barca an "extra allowance” of 5% upon the award. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The valuation of the commissioners was arrived at in accord with established procedure and we find it to be fair and proper. Moreover, Special Term did not abuse its discretion by its award of a statutory 5% additional allowance (see Condemnation Law, § 16, subd 2). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, plaintiff appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 3, 1975, which, inter alia, (1) confirmed a report of commissioners of appraisal and (2) granted respondents Barca an "extra allowance” of 5% upon the award. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The valuation of the commissioners was arrived at in accord with established procedure and we find it to be fair and proper. Moreover, Special Term did not abuse its discretion by its award of a statutory 5% additional allowance (see Condemnation Law, § 16, subd 2). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 604, 382 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yonkers-community-development-agency-v-barca-nyappdiv-1976.