Yonkers-Cameo, Inc. v. Liossatos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yonkers-Cameo, Inc. v. Liossatos

262 A.D. 996, 30 N.Y.S.2d 818

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 996 (Yonkers-Cameo, Inc. v. Liossatos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yonkers-Cameo, Inc. v. Liossatos, 262 A.D. 996, 30 N.Y.S.2d 818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by providing that as a

condition to any liability on the part of the third party appellant to pay the. sum demanded, the passbook must be presented or a bond in double the amount of the deposit be furnished by the judgment creditor respondent, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by providing that as a

condition to any liability on the part of the third party appellant to pay the. sum demanded, the passbook must be presented or a bond in double the amount of the deposit be furnished by the judgment creditor respondent, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 996, 30 N.Y.S.2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yonkers-cameo-inc-v-liossatos-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack