Yoni Javier Estopinales v. State of Florida

165 So. 3d 757, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641, 2015 WL 2393360
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 2015·No. 4D15-516·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Regarding appellant’s claim for additional jail credit, he may file a sworn and legally sufficient rule 3.801 motion within the time remaining under the rule. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(c) (setting forth the required contents for such a motion). As for appellant’s claim that his Broward and Volusia County sentences were to run concurrently, he may file a sworn motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging that such was an express condition of his plea, if he can do so in good faith. See, e.g., Bruce v. State, 679 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Affirmed without prejudice.

GROSS, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yoni Javier Estopinales v. State of Florida, 165 So. 3d 757, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641, 2015 WL 2393360 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

165 So. 3d 757 (Yoni Javier Estopinales v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruce v. State
679 So. 2d 45 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)