Yoni Javier Estopinales v. State of Florida
Opinion
We affirm without prejudice the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Regarding appellant’s claim for additional jail credit, he may file a sworn and legally sufficient rule 3.801 motion within the time remaining under the rule. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(c) (setting forth the required contents for such a motion). As for appellant’s claim that his Broward and Volusia County sentences were to run concurrently, he may file a sworn motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging that such was an express condition of his plea, if he can do so in good faith. See, e.g., Bruce v. State, 679 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
Affirmed without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
165 So. 3d 757 (Yoni Javier Estopinales v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.