Yongo v. US Army Active Duty

Fourth Circuit

Yongo v. US Army Active Duty

267 F. App'x 230

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2008·No. Nos. 07-1456, 07-1608·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Paul Yon-go appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), and denying his motion for an injunction pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. U.S. Army Active Duty, No. 5:07-cv-00093-FL (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2007; May 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[231]*231fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Paul Yon-go appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), and denying his motion for an injunction pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. U.S. Army Active Duty, No. 5:07-cv-00093-FL (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2007; May 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[231]*231fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Yongo v. US Army Active Duty, 267 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

267 F. App'x 230 (Yongo v. US Army Active Duty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related