Yongo v. City of Raleigh

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2007·No. 07-1730·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1730

PAUL YONGO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF RALEIGH; JOSHUA LEE ZELLMER,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-1826

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00180)

Submitted: November 2, 2007 Decided: December 3, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Yongo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Paul Yongo appeals the

district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), and denying reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find that these appeals are frivolous.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Yongo v. City of Raleigh, No. 5:07-cv-00180

(E.D.N.C. July 19, 2007; August 15, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yongo v. City of Raleigh, (4th Cir. 2007).

Yongo v. City of Raleigh (Yongo v. City of Raleigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)