Yonge v. Nash Loan Co.

179 S.E. 570, 51 Ga. App. 35, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 535
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 26, 1935
Docket24593
StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 570 (Yonge v. Nash Loan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yonge v. Nash Loan Co., 179 S.E. 570, 51 Ga. App. 35, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 535 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The Court of Appeals, as provided in an amendment of 1916 to the constitution (Ga. L. 1916, p. 19), has jurisdiction to review certain designated cases only from the superior courts, the city courts of Atlanta and Savannah, and “such other like courts as have been or • may hereafter be established in other cities,” and, also, as provided in an amendment of 1927 to the constitution (Ga. L. 1927, p. 117; Dillon v. Continental Trust Co., 179 Ga. 198, 175 S. E. 652), from certain other courts as the General Assembly may prescribe.

2. The municipal court of Savannah, which was established in the City of Savannah by acts of 1915 and 1927 (Ga. L. 1915, p. 124, Ga. L. [36]*361927, p. 460), and acts amendatory thereof, not being one of the courts mentioned above, and there being no statute of the General Assembly of this ■ State authorizing a review by the Court of Appeals of cases decided in the municipal court of Savannah, the Court of Appeals has . no jurisdiction to review directly, on bill of exceptions, a judgment of the municipal court of Savannah.

Decided March 26, 1935. W. G. Warnell, E. J. Goodwin, for plaintiff in error. Hester & Ciarle, contra.

3. This case coming to this court on direct bill of exceptions from a judgment of the municipal court of Savannah dismissing an affidavit of illegality filed by the defendant in that court, the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to review the case, and the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error for lack of jurisdiction is sustained.

Writ of error dismissed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dillon v. Continental Trust Co.
175 S.E. 652 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 S.E. 570, 51 Ga. App. 35, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yonge-v-nash-loan-co-gactapp-1935.