Yong Hee Chung v. American Express Company

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJanuary 27, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-02655
StatusUnknown

This text of Yong Hee Chung v. American Express Company (Yong Hee Chung v. American Express Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yong Hee Chung v. American Express Company, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-02655-SSS-E Document 34 Filed 01/27/23 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:188

1 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP BRIAN C. FRONTINO (State Bar No. 222032) 2 ALICE KWAK (State Bar No. 318883) 2029 Century Park East, 18th Floor 3 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 Telephone: 310.556.5800 4 Facsimile: 310.556.5959 Email: lacalendar@stroock.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, erroneously sued as AMERICAN EXPRESS 7 COMPANY 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YONG HEE CHUNG, ) Case No. 2:22-cv-02655-SSS-E ) 12 Plaintiff, ) [Assigned to the Hon. Sunshine S. ) 13 v. ) Sykes] 14 AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 15 Defendant. ) ORDER ) 16 ) ) 17 ) ) 18 ) ) 19 ) ) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:22-cv-02655-GW-E MIA 31596974v1 MIA 31596974v2 Case 2:22-cv-02655-SSS-E Document 34 Filed 01/27/23 Page 2 of 20 Page ID #:189

1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 5 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter 6 the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order 7 does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and 8 that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 9 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 10 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 11 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file 12 confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures 13 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks 14 permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 16 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, private financial information and 17 records, and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical 18 and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure 19 and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. 20 Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 21 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 22 confidential business practices, financial records and account information (including 23 records and information implicating privacy rights of third parties), or information 24 otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or 25 otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case 26 decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to 27 facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery 28 -2 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:22-cv-02655-GW-E MIA 31596974v1 MIA 31596974v2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:22-cv-02655-GW-E MIA 31596974v1 MIA 31596974v2 PLL NAVAL & KCOORTS & KCOORTS ROOLF HT81 ,TSAE KRAP YRUTNEC 9202 6803-76009 AC ,SELEGNA SOL Case 2:22-cv-02655-SSS-E Document 34 Filed 01/27/23 Page 3 of 20 Page ID #:190 materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit, captioned Yong Hee Chung v. American Express Company, Case No. 2:22-cv-02655-GW-E. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: extremely sensitive and/or proprietary “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDIENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:22-cv-02655-GW-E MIA 31596974v1 MIA 31596974v2 PLL NAVAL & KCOORTS & KCOORTS ROOLF HT81 ,TSAE KRAP YRUTNEC 9202 6803-76009 AC ,SELEGNA SOL Case 2:22-cv-02655-SSS-E Document 34 Filed 01/27/23 Page 4 of 20 Page ID #:191 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, House Counsel, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:22-cv-02655-GW-E MIA 31596974v1 MIA 31596974v2 PLL NAVAL & KCOORTS & KCOORTS ROOLF HT81 ,TSAE KRAP YRUTNEC 9202 6803-76009 AC ,SELEGNA SOL Case 2:22-cv-02655-SSS-E Document 34 Filed 01/27/23 Page 5 of 20 Page ID #:192 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yong Hee Chung v. American Express Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yong-hee-chung-v-american-express-company-cacd-2023.