Yonetani v. Advanced Call Center Technologies Johnson City

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE GREENEVILLE DIVISION

DENISE R. YONETANI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) 2:24-CV-00188-DCLC-CRW )

v. )

) ADVANCED CALL CENTER ) TECHNOLOGIES JOHNSON CITY and ) BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER This matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 5]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 1] be denied and that the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff did not file any objections to the R&R.1 See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). After thorough consideration of the R&R and the record as a whole, the Court finds that the magistrate judge properly analyzed the issues presented. For the reasons set out in the R&R, it is hereby ORDERED that the R&R [Doc. 5] is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 1] is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED: s/ Clifton L. Corker United States District Judge

1 Failure to file objections within the 14-day period pursuant to Rule 72(b) results in waiver of the right to appeal the Court’s order. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 153-54 (1985).