Yolanda Ramos v. Anthony Nicosia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 1, 2017
Docket04-16-00760-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Yolanda Ramos v. Anthony Nicosia (Yolanda Ramos v. Anthony Nicosia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yolanda Ramos v. Anthony Nicosia, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00760-CV

Yolanda RAMOS, Appellant

v.

Anthony NICOSIA, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-CI-03447 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2017

DISMISSED

A filing fee of $205.00 was due when Yolanda Ramos filed this appeal, but it was not paid.

See TEX. R. APP. 5; TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN CIVIL CASES

IN THE SUPREME COURT AND THE COURTS OF APPEALS AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 159158, Aug. 28, 2015). The clerk of the court

notified Ramos of this deficiency by letter, but the fee remained unpaid. In addition, the trial court

clerk filed a notification of late record, stating the record would not be filed because Ramos has 04-16-00760-CV

not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee to prepare the record and Ramos is not entitled

to the record without paying the fee.

On January 13, 2017, we therefore ordered that Ramos must, by January 19, 2017, either

(1) pay the appellate filing fee and show that arrangements had been made to pay the trial court

clerk’s fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that she is indigent or otherwise excused by

statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 20.1.

The court advised Ramos that if she failed to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, the

appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

Ramos has not paid the filing fee or the trial court clerk’s fee or otherwise responded to

our January 13, 2017 order. We therefore dismiss this appeal.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yolanda Ramos v. Anthony Nicosia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yolanda-ramos-v-anthony-nicosia-texapp-2017.