Yolanda Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Yolanda Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I. Read the opinion of the Court — 748 F.3d 911
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2014·No. 11-18067·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YOLANDA E. QUIHUIS and No. 11-18067 ROBERT QUIHUIS, a married couple, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 4:10-cv-00376-RCC

v. ORDER AMENDING STATE FARM MUTUAL ORDER CERTIFYING AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE QUESTION TO THE COMPANY, a foreign ARIZONA SUPREME corporation, COURT Defendant-Appellee.

Filed May 6, 2014

Before: Richard C. Tallman and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge.*

Order

* The Honorable Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The certification order filed on April 4, 2014, is amended as follows:

1. At page 7, lines 15–17, delete <> and insert <>.

2. At page 8, lines 5–7, delete <> and insert <>.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yolanda Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, (9th Cir. 2014).

Yolanda Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I (Yolanda Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.