Yolanda Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YOLANDA E. QUIHUIS and No. 11-18067 ROBERT QUIHUIS, a married couple, D.C. No.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 4:10-cv-00376-RCC

v.

ORDER AMENDING

STATE FARM MUTUAL ORDER CERTIFYING AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE QUESTION TO THE COMPANY, a foreign ARIZONA SUPREME corporation, COURT Defendant-Appellee.

Filed May 6, 2014

Before: Richard C. Tallman and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge.*

Order

*

The Honorable Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

2 QUIHUIS V. STATE FARM

ORDER

The certification order filed on April 4, 2014, is amended as follows:

1. At page 7, lines 15–17, delete <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Bojorquezes not to execute a judgment against them>> and insert <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Quihuises not to execute a judgment against them>>.

2. At page 8, lines 5–7, delete <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Bojorquezes that the Coxes owned the Jeep>> and insert <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Quihuises that the Coxes owned the Jeep>>.