Yokum v. KARNO II INC.
36 So. 3d 257
Opinion
Peterson M. YOKUM, et al.
v.
Nicholas S. KARNO II Inc., et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. Although relator was unable to produce a copy of the order setting the return date, the evidence attached to the application reveals the application to the court of appeal was filed timely. See Rambo v. Willis-Knighton Bossier Health Center, 00-2157 (La.7/28/00), 766 So.2d 1262. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yokum v. KARNO II INC., 36 So. 3d 257 (La. 2010).
36 So. 3d 257 (Yokum v. KARNO II INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rambo v. Willis-Knighton Bossier Health Center
766 So. 2d 1262 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2000)