Yokohama Rubber Company, Ltd. v. Rigoberto Rivera, Individually, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Hortencia Villanueva, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Antonio M. Villanueva

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 22, 2004
Docket13-02-00205-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Yokohama Rubber Company, Ltd. v. Rigoberto Rivera, Individually, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Hortencia Villanueva, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Antonio M. Villanueva (Yokohama Rubber Company, Ltd. v. Rigoberto Rivera, Individually, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Hortencia Villanueva, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Antonio M. Villanueva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yokohama Rubber Company, Ltd. v. Rigoberto Rivera, Individually, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Hortencia Villanueva, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Antonio M. Villanueva, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-02-205-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


YOKOHAMA RUBBER COMPANY, LTD.,                              Appellant,


v.


RIGOBERTO RIVERA, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL.,                      Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Dorsey

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, YOKOHAMA RUBBER COMPANY, LTD., perfected an appeal from an order entered by the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-1745-00-B. After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was orally argued to the Court, the parties filed an agreed motion to set aside the order on appeal without regard to the merits and remand for entry of judgment in conformity with settlement.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties’ agreed motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The agreed motion is granted, and the order of the trial court is hereby SET ASIDE and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for entry of judgment in conformity with the parties’ settlement agreement.  

                                                      PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 22nd day of July, 2004.


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yokohama Rubber Company, Ltd. v. Rigoberto Rivera, Individually, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Hortencia Villanueva, and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Antonio M. Villanueva, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yokohama-rubber-company-ltd-v-rigoberto-rivera-individually-as-texapp-2004.