Yohe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yohe v. State

453 So. 2d 206, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14226

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 25, 1984

DocketNo. 83-142

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 206 (Yohe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yohe v. State, 453 So. 2d 206, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree that there was no evidence to support the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay his costs of supervision. Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So.2d 607 (1947). Upon remand the trial court is instructed to correct this finding which was probably the result of a clerical error.

The appealed order is manifestly supported by other violations on the part of appellant and no other error has been demonstrated.

We particularly find that no error was committed by the trial court in requiring Yohe to identify himself as the probationer. State v. Heath, 343 So.2d 13 (Fla.1977) and Watson v. State, 388 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI