Yohe v. Commissioner of Social Security

Fourth Circuit

Yohe v. Commissioner of Social Security

416 F. App'x 275

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2011·No. No. 10-1448·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Penny K. Yohe appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny Yohe supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yohe v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 5:09-cv-00075-FPS-JES, 2010 WL 1417960 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Penny K. Yohe appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny Yohe supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yohe v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 5:09-cv-00075-FPS-JES, 2010 WL 1417960 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Yohe v. Commissioner of Social Security, 416 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

416 F. App'x 275 (Yohe v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.