Yoemans v. State

134 So. 237, 101 Fla. 551
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 8, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 237 (Yoemans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yoemans v. State, 134 So. 237, 101 Fla. 551 (Fla. 1931).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

On authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Benton vs. The State, 74 Fla. 30, 76 Sou. 341, the writ of certiorari should be quashed. It is so ordered.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, and Terrell, J.J. concur. Brown, J., dissents. Davis, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brinson v. Tharin
127 So. 313 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Benton v. State
76 So. 341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 So. 237, 101 Fla. 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yoemans-v-state-fla-1931.