YOEL GUERRA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 23, 2021
Docket20-0920
StatusPublished

This text of YOEL GUERRA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION (YOEL GUERRA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
YOEL GUERRA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 23, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________

Nos. 3D20-919; 3D20-920 Lower Tribunal No. 17-20589 ________________

The Strems Law Firm, P.A., and Yoel Guerra, et al., Appellants,

vs.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Appellee.

Appeals from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Judge.

Giasi Law, P.A., Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger (Tampa), for appellant, The Strems Law Firm, P.A.; The Property Advocates, P.A., Samuel C. Gold and Cecile S. Mendizabal, for appellants, Yoel Guerra, Ketty Evelyn Boza and Ihosvany Almore.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Mark D. Tinker (Tampa), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So. 2d 443, 444 (Fla. 1990)

(“Rule 1.540 was intended to provide relief from judgments, decrees or

orders under a limited set of circumstances. This rule was not intended to

serve as a substitute . . . for appellate review of judicial error.” (internal

quotation omitted)); see also Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So. 2d 221, 226

(Fla. 2002) (“[A] trial court possesses the inherent authority to impose

attorneys’ fees against an attorney for bad faith conduct.”); Commonwealth

Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So. 2d 1271, 1273 (Fla. 1990)

(reaffirming that a trial judge has the “discretion to order dismissal or default

for failure to comply with discovery requirements”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curbelo v. Ullman
571 So. 2d 443 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Tubero
569 So. 2d 1271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Moakley v. Smallwood
826 So. 2d 221 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
YOEL GUERRA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yoel-guerra-v-citizens-property-insurance-corporation-fladistctapp-2021.